PENN STATE, JOE PA AND HOMESEXALITY: WHO IS RESPONSIBLE?
Recent child abuse report by former Penn State assistant football coach shows only one side of the story: blame game by reporters and “lack of backbone for the university administrators.
To start with, homosexuality was prevalent in the human history but was not “open”. Religious writings of several world religions indicate the existence of “homosexuality” even in the BCs.
Why it is so prevalent and “open” now? Answer is in the recent changes in social rules.
For example take all the 8 items listed below and ask yourself: Why should children wait until 18 years to have sex of homosexual activities? Why do they have to reject the advances of adults? Many children consider themselves as adults and Society encourage children to act adults during the teenage years
(1)Government and major corporations accepted homosexual relationships by giving benefits to partners
(2)State Governments are accepting homosexual marriages as equal to conventional marriages
(3)Publically Gays and lesbian organizations demonstrate in the street for “openness”
(4)Courts accept “homosexuality” is normal
(5)Teenage pregnancy is not vehemently opposed by the society, but even it is encouraged by the actions of the society by distribution of condoms, open discussion in the class room, parents’ negligence on boys’ responsibility to teenage pregnancy. Etc.
(6)Our lack of understanding on the early maturity of children believing the artificial 18 years is the right yard stick. Children could marry much lower age than 18 years in many countries, olden times it was common even in this country.
(7)Now many Children do mature during the early teenage years. If they mature early why not have the same rights of adults?
(8)Teenagers drink, smoke, take drugs, drive and having sex. They are all accepted by the society
RESULT?
TEENAGERS AND CHILDREN WATCH THE SOCIAL CHANGES AND ACCEPT HOMOSEXALITY AS ALSO NORMAL. Children always want to be grownups because they believe they deserve all rights of the adults. As a result, they will not oppose an adult’s approach to them for sex. “It is normal, Why not?” That is their question!
In their mind “homo sexuality is normal, adults could do it, I am mature, then why not I could do the same”
Now when a child abuse happen “openly”, all newspapers jump in and blame the adult for the act, which is right to do so, but also blame “all the people those who know him”.
That is the case with Joe Pa at Penn State. Even Trustees jump into the bandwagon.
Let the court decide the case. Moral issues? Are you kidding? Those who talk about others’ moral issues should also open their own historical library!. Joe PA is not responsible for keeping everyone in the “moral football court”. Can we keep all our friends in a moral world?
Did we blame Pope for the abuses of the children by church few church officials, even could dismiss them? Did we ask Pope to leave office? No. Joe Pa could not fire an assistant Coach. He could report the act and he did!
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Monday, March 28, 2011
HIPOCRACY OF AMERICA & OLD COLONIALISTS
Over the last 300 years, Europe exploited rest of the world for raw materials and man power to live like Kings of the World. 1947 onwards, the Empires started burning down. Europe’s economy started going down and down and many European countries became one of the so-called third world nations and at the same time new economic powers mushrooming around the globe: China, India, Brazil, South America and many smaller countries Singapore, Thailand.
Now Oil–rich Muslim Middle East countries are showing internal conflict. In the name of democracy, US-led western nations started interfering in the internal affairs of these countries. Is it starting of a new economic colonialism even though that is not in the American calendar. The hypocrisy of these interventions needs to be examined.
Take for example, United Nations Security council voted to interfere in Libya without the approval of countries representing 60% of the population. Security Council was persuaded by UK, France and USA.
Let us compare Libya’s “freedom fighters” and actions taken by UN+France+UK+USA together to other similar agitations of the world for the last 10 years
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Countries // Action taken by UN+USA // Reason for “no action”
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) China suppresses Tibet & Muslim people: // None // Rich, Big Nuclear
(2) North Korea // None // Nuclear
(3) India (Kashmir) // None // Rich, Big, Nuclear
(4) Russia (Chechnya) // None // Rich, Big, Nuclear
(5) Israel (Palestine) // None // Friend, Jewish
(6) Iran //None //Big Oil, Nuclear (?)
(7) Saudi. Arabia // None // Big oil
(8) Yemen // None // Terrorism friendly
(9) Bahrain // None // Military Base
(10) Many African Countries // None // Small, (?)
Why the differences in action taken by the so-called Peaceful nations of Western Europe and USA except, Libya is small and oil rich, probably easy to control if agitators get rid of the present Government. United Nations Security Council should explain the differences of these countries with that of Libya.
Each country should have the right to decide what political system that they want, rather than white western world tell them what they can have. That is new type of colonialism supported by United Nations Security Council.
Over the last 300 years, Europe exploited rest of the world for raw materials and man power to live like Kings of the World. 1947 onwards, the Empires started burning down. Europe’s economy started going down and down and many European countries became one of the so-called third world nations and at the same time new economic powers mushrooming around the globe: China, India, Brazil, South America and many smaller countries Singapore, Thailand.
Now Oil–rich Muslim Middle East countries are showing internal conflict. In the name of democracy, US-led western nations started interfering in the internal affairs of these countries. Is it starting of a new economic colonialism even though that is not in the American calendar. The hypocrisy of these interventions needs to be examined.
Take for example, United Nations Security council voted to interfere in Libya without the approval of countries representing 60% of the population. Security Council was persuaded by UK, France and USA.
Let us compare Libya’s “freedom fighters” and actions taken by UN+France+UK+USA together to other similar agitations of the world for the last 10 years
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Countries // Action taken by UN+USA // Reason for “no action”
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) China suppresses Tibet & Muslim people: // None // Rich, Big Nuclear
(2) North Korea // None // Nuclear
(3) India (Kashmir) // None // Rich, Big, Nuclear
(4) Russia (Chechnya) // None // Rich, Big, Nuclear
(5) Israel (Palestine) // None // Friend, Jewish
(6) Iran //None //Big Oil, Nuclear (?)
(7) Saudi. Arabia // None // Big oil
(8) Yemen // None // Terrorism friendly
(9) Bahrain // None // Military Base
(10) Many African Countries // None // Small, (?)
Why the differences in action taken by the so-called Peaceful nations of Western Europe and USA except, Libya is small and oil rich, probably easy to control if agitators get rid of the present Government. United Nations Security Council should explain the differences of these countries with that of Libya.
Each country should have the right to decide what political system that they want, rather than white western world tell them what they can have. That is new type of colonialism supported by United Nations Security Council.
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
IS UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL DEMOCRATIC?
IS UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL DEMOCRATIC?
Let us Examine based on most recent Voting and Decision to Bomb Libya.
Definition of Democracy: “Rule of the Majority”.
United Nations Security Council of 15 nations represents the world population. Obama said regarding the Libyan bombing vote: It was ‘almost unanimous”. There is no “almost unanimous”, either unanimous or not. Brazil, China, Germany, India and Russia did not vote. That constitutes over 60% of the population.
Obama should not know “what democracy is?" He is supporting democratically elected Senators from Wisconsin to stay away in Illinois and encouraged their non-democratic actions. We preach democracy, but we do not practice actual democracy in our Nation. US Senate do not represent US population. We are republic, not democratic republic.
There is a difference.
So UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL is not democratic even though they passed a resolution to intend to create democracy in Libya...
Let us Examine based on most recent Voting and Decision to Bomb Libya.
Definition of Democracy: “Rule of the Majority”.
United Nations Security Council of 15 nations represents the world population. Obama said regarding the Libyan bombing vote: It was ‘almost unanimous”. There is no “almost unanimous”, either unanimous or not. Brazil, China, Germany, India and Russia did not vote. That constitutes over 60% of the population.
Obama should not know “what democracy is?" He is supporting democratically elected Senators from Wisconsin to stay away in Illinois and encouraged their non-democratic actions. We preach democracy, but we do not practice actual democracy in our Nation. US Senate do not represent US population. We are republic, not democratic republic.
There is a difference.
So UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL is not democratic even though they passed a resolution to intend to create democracy in Libya...
AMERICAN PRESIDENTS SHOULD STUDY MODERN WORLD HISTORY BEFORE STARTING WAR.
AMERICAN PRESIDENTS SHOULD STUDY MODERN WORLD HISTORY BEFORE STARTING WAR.
This is nothing to do with Obama alone, but to all recent Presidents including Bush II. Before getting into the Oval Office , they should know the Modern World History, not just knowing Medieval History on how to spread Christianity into the world or spreading of Islam during 6th to 12 Century. The methods used to spread christanity and Islam does not work in the modern world, probably the methods used by Buddhism should work well, that is let the people decide.
NOW: As I said earlier in an article that Islam is not ready for democracy, don’t try to impose on them, like the methods used to convert people to Christianity and Islam. The fate of democracy is clearly visible throughout Islamic world, it does not work. Pakistan tried several times, and failed. Russians tried to change the Islamic way of life in Afghanistan, but failed, of course with our help with money and weapons. We tried in Afghanistan and still trying. Now we are spending Billions of borrowed dollars in Iraq, Afghanistan, now in Libya. Why? Are we still trying to spread Democracy like we did spreading Christianity? World Changed. Accept reality of the world and our bad economic position in the world.
Democracy is not for all people, you cannot impose on them. When and if people are ready, they will accept without the preaching of the Clinton or Obama. Religions do play an important role. Look over the Modern History. !947. Indian sub continent divided into two, based on religion. Same people lived together for thousands of years with the same conditions except their religious believes: Hinduism and Islam. When they divided based on religion, one became democratic and other became autocratic even though leaders of both groups wanted democracy.
Clinton or Obama or Bush cannot impose democracy like medieval methods used to convert people to Christianity or to Islam. Stop trying.
This is nothing to do with Obama alone, but to all recent Presidents including Bush II. Before getting into the Oval Office , they should know the Modern World History, not just knowing Medieval History on how to spread Christianity into the world or spreading of Islam during 6th to 12 Century. The methods used to spread christanity and Islam does not work in the modern world, probably the methods used by Buddhism should work well, that is let the people decide.
NOW: As I said earlier in an article that Islam is not ready for democracy, don’t try to impose on them, like the methods used to convert people to Christianity and Islam. The fate of democracy is clearly visible throughout Islamic world, it does not work. Pakistan tried several times, and failed. Russians tried to change the Islamic way of life in Afghanistan, but failed, of course with our help with money and weapons. We tried in Afghanistan and still trying. Now we are spending Billions of borrowed dollars in Iraq, Afghanistan, now in Libya. Why? Are we still trying to spread Democracy like we did spreading Christianity? World Changed. Accept reality of the world and our bad economic position in the world.
Democracy is not for all people, you cannot impose on them. When and if people are ready, they will accept without the preaching of the Clinton or Obama. Religions do play an important role. Look over the Modern History. !947. Indian sub continent divided into two, based on religion. Same people lived together for thousands of years with the same conditions except their religious believes: Hinduism and Islam. When they divided based on religion, one became democratic and other became autocratic even though leaders of both groups wanted democracy.
Clinton or Obama or Bush cannot impose democracy like medieval methods used to convert people to Christianity or to Islam. Stop trying.
Monday, February 21, 2011
DEMOCRACY OUSIDE & NON-DEMOCRATIC ACTIVITIES INSIDE?
DEMOCRACY OUSIDE & NON-DEMOCRATIC ACTIVITIES INSIDE?
President and Secretary of state are trying to export “democracy” across the Arab world by encouraging “freedom agitations”. The “correctness” or “interfering the internal affairs” of other countries is not the topic of this comment.
When we support “democracy” outside of our country, we should not support non-democratic activities within the country. That is exactly the President is doing when the President opposes democratic process in Wisconsin. He is not asking his party Senators to act as Senators rather than encouraging them to move to Illinois, so that Wisconsin Police cannot “arrest” them and bring back to the Senate Chamber.
We have only one President at a time, and he should act as President rather than AFL-CIO Cheer Leader and indirectly, at least encourage non-democratic activities of the elected state officials.
President and Secretary of state are trying to export “democracy” across the Arab world by encouraging “freedom agitations”. The “correctness” or “interfering the internal affairs” of other countries is not the topic of this comment.
When we support “democracy” outside of our country, we should not support non-democratic activities within the country. That is exactly the President is doing when the President opposes democratic process in Wisconsin. He is not asking his party Senators to act as Senators rather than encouraging them to move to Illinois, so that Wisconsin Police cannot “arrest” them and bring back to the Senate Chamber.
We have only one President at a time, and he should act as President rather than AFL-CIO Cheer Leader and indirectly, at least encourage non-democratic activities of the elected state officials.
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
Revolution in Arab World & American Contribution to it
In summary, the events follow the statements of American Leaders!
Mr. Kerry,the head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who has also talked to Arab leaders, said the crisis in Egypt had caused American allies to question “what sort of longevity there is to the notion of alliances.” But, he added, “they have to understand: this is not us making some kind of decision; this is the people of Egypt making a decision.” 100,000 People making decisions for 80 million people of Egypt! Is that democractic pathway?
Kerry is wrong!!
See Secretary Clinton’s statement, one month before the agitation she warned about the need for reform in the Arab world in Qatar last month, she said, “I could not have been clearer about our concerns for all of these governments.” Are we in control of the World? That is our problem. We interfere in internal mattersf the other SMALL nations. Did we do anything during the Chinese agitation for democracy. NO! They are big and will not give any attention to our President or Secretary of State. We are still barking at Chinese for Democracy.
One Arab diplomat correctly stated the composition of agitators are students and the so-called democratic value protectors and what will happen at the end: “Eventually, those students will have to get off that train and go back to school, and the human rights people will have to go back to work, and you know who will be on the train when it finally rolls into the station?” the diplomat asked. “The Muslim Brotherhood”. Did he forget Secretary Clinton, President Obama and Biden?
Fact of the matter is Islamic world is not ready for democracy. For sixty three years Pakistan tried several times and miserably failed. Even today, actual democracy in Pakistan is questionable. Turkey is the only Muslim country practices democracy, only because it’s economic tie-up and social relationship with Western Europe.
One benefit of all these is the following. President Obama wants to see the oil price increase, so that he could “invest” borrowed Chinese money in clean energy and make most or all Americans poor and our children could become under the thump of communist economic system. It may not be his intention or esign but that will be the result.
Every President should have life experiences and foreign policy experiences before becoming the President of a Country. Speech making will not give Foreign Policy experiences.
Mr. Kerry,the head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, who has also talked to Arab leaders, said the crisis in Egypt had caused American allies to question “what sort of longevity there is to the notion of alliances.” But, he added, “they have to understand: this is not us making some kind of decision; this is the people of Egypt making a decision.” 100,000 People making decisions for 80 million people of Egypt! Is that democractic pathway?
Kerry is wrong!!
See Secretary Clinton’s statement, one month before the agitation she warned about the need for reform in the Arab world in Qatar last month, she said, “I could not have been clearer about our concerns for all of these governments.” Are we in control of the World? That is our problem. We interfere in internal mattersf the other SMALL nations. Did we do anything during the Chinese agitation for democracy. NO! They are big and will not give any attention to our President or Secretary of State. We are still barking at Chinese for Democracy.
One Arab diplomat correctly stated the composition of agitators are students and the so-called democratic value protectors and what will happen at the end: “Eventually, those students will have to get off that train and go back to school, and the human rights people will have to go back to work, and you know who will be on the train when it finally rolls into the station?” the diplomat asked. “The Muslim Brotherhood”. Did he forget Secretary Clinton, President Obama and Biden?
Fact of the matter is Islamic world is not ready for democracy. For sixty three years Pakistan tried several times and miserably failed. Even today, actual democracy in Pakistan is questionable. Turkey is the only Muslim country practices democracy, only because it’s economic tie-up and social relationship with Western Europe.
One benefit of all these is the following. President Obama wants to see the oil price increase, so that he could “invest” borrowed Chinese money in clean energy and make most or all Americans poor and our children could become under the thump of communist economic system. It may not be his intention or esign but that will be the result.
Every President should have life experiences and foreign policy experiences before becoming the President of a Country. Speech making will not give Foreign Policy experiences.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
A PRIMER LIST FOR DESTRUCTION OF JOBS & INDUSTRY
*Mr. Abel and Steel workers union destroyed Steel industry. All the jobs went overseas. Now we import most of the steel. We can cry now.
**Auto union workers forced most of the production moved to overseas due to demand for more union benefits and salaries. We took over the auto industry partially and waiting for the complete destruction.
***Electronic industry moved overseas due to high union demand. We buy all electronic goods manufactured overseas under the name of American companies. High paying jobs are lost to foreign countries.
**** All the clothes that we buy are made in overseas. We lost those jobs.
THIS IS THE WAY GOVERNMENT PUSHED INDUSTRY AND JOBS OVERSEAS. THEY ARE REPEATING THE PROCESS AGAIN. .
NOW PRESIDENT OBAMA, POLITICIANS MAINLY DEMOCRATIC AND ENVIRINMENTALISTS TOGETHER FORCING BP AND OTHER OIL INDUSTRIES MOVE TO OVERSEAS AND EXPLORE OIL DEPOSITS ON THE ASIAN COASTLINES. DO THEY CARE JOB LOSS?
Foreign countries are ready to receive oil companies and increase their employment, family income, exports to US and overall increase their wealth. Oh. I forgot. We could borrow from these countries and give to teachers, Government workers and increase unemployment benefits.
WE WANT TO BE A THIRD WORLD NATION. GOVERNMENT IS DOING A GREAT JOB.
*Mr. Abel and Steel workers union destroyed Steel industry. All the jobs went overseas. Now we import most of the steel. We can cry now.
**Auto union workers forced most of the production moved to overseas due to demand for more union benefits and salaries. We took over the auto industry partially and waiting for the complete destruction.
***Electronic industry moved overseas due to high union demand. We buy all electronic goods manufactured overseas under the name of American companies. High paying jobs are lost to foreign countries.
**** All the clothes that we buy are made in overseas. We lost those jobs.
THIS IS THE WAY GOVERNMENT PUSHED INDUSTRY AND JOBS OVERSEAS. THEY ARE REPEATING THE PROCESS AGAIN. .
NOW PRESIDENT OBAMA, POLITICIANS MAINLY DEMOCRATIC AND ENVIRINMENTALISTS TOGETHER FORCING BP AND OTHER OIL INDUSTRIES MOVE TO OVERSEAS AND EXPLORE OIL DEPOSITS ON THE ASIAN COASTLINES. DO THEY CARE JOB LOSS?
Foreign countries are ready to receive oil companies and increase their employment, family income, exports to US and overall increase their wealth. Oh. I forgot. We could borrow from these countries and give to teachers, Government workers and increase unemployment benefits.
WE WANT TO BE A THIRD WORLD NATION. GOVERNMENT IS DOING A GREAT JOB.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)